Current Date :July 21, 2024

5 Critical Mistakes to Avoid in Your QA Testing Process

All software depends on a crack QA testing team to work correctly. By discovering bugs or other discrepancies in a part of the software, these teams assure customers are satisfied with your products. Nevertheless, the last few years have seen a steady reduction in budget allocation for this work. This has been occurring around the world.

Bug-riddled software can have a dramatic influence on the client onboarding process, and a significant influence on business success. Users that encounter difficulties with your software can be set off to the point they end using it altogether.

For apps, this dilemma is especially acute; 34 percent of smartphone users will halt using an app if they find a defect. In light of stats like these, it’s crucial QA professionals use their time efficiently. 

By identifying these common errors (and learning how to avoid them) people working in QA can promote themselves and their teams to do a greater job than ever. 

1. Failing to define the testing scope

One of the first errors software testers can make is missing knowing the full scope of their job. QA testing is a complex task that consists of various distinct tasks. Functional testing – a focus on characteristics rather than code – is a fundamental area, but others include performance testing, security testing, and so on. All important areas must be considered through the testing process.

As such, it’s essential to make enough time for proper testing. If you’re habitually testing software near the end of development, it’s more possible problems and mistakes will creep in. This is because of the time pressures laid on software testers – since you’re the only ones holding development, you’re more likely to act immediately and miss important problems. 

Even with lots of time allotted, you’ll probably require to prioritize specific tasks over others. Code quality, for instance, is a specially important area. You should also ensure you don’t neglect tasks like regression testing. It’s possible a different feature could include bugs and compromise existing features. Regular regression testing assures this doesn’t become a problem.  


2. Poor documentation 

Of course, to know what progress you’re making, you require to write things down. Sloppy documentation is another fundamental mistake that’s often performed during the testing process. 

Somebody should document each project’s overall specifications and functionalities before testing begins. If you’re not certain how to do this, see past your in-house team and contract someone. This is no different from managing outsourced content marketing services – if you require top-tier work, it pays to see past the limits of your business. 

This has a few benefits. Outsourcing enables you to hire top talent so you can start on the best footing. Starting strong assures the QA team knows their task and that all tasks are performed in line with your plan. If there are any conflicts or questions about what people should be performing, this document can define matters. 

Recording progress on particular tasks is also required. A lack of documentation here usually means QA teams operate inefficiently or even overlook jobs altogether. In extreme situations, it can point to functions being tested multiple times for no beneficial purpose, with certain characteristics left buggy or entirely omitted. 

By simplifying tasks and progress in this way, members of a QA team have a more solid idea of what everyone is doing. This also assures that when things go wrong, it’s easy to know what’s been performed and how best to fix it. 

3. Using tools improperly

Today’s QA testers have many tools they can employ to do their jobs. However, they may be overly reliant on some tools or fail to use others to complete effect.

One beneficial tool QA testers use is automation. If you’ve acted in QA for a while, or ever had to match RPA and BPM, you’re likely familiar with it. There are different areas of software testing that don’t require regular human oversight. If time is at a premium, this type of automation can be very useful. This is often the case for jobs like regression testing, load testing, and performance testing. 

That said, it’s important to understand that automated testing can’t resolve every dilemma. There are various reasons for this, and it’s constantly worth asking when you should automate software testing and when you’re more suited to manage tasks manually. 

One approach to balance cost and performance is to look into tools that speed up manual testing, such as task management or test management tools. These can assist you to better visualize your testing method. They also offer advantages such as test cases & defect management and integration with other software (like communication and social media) in some cases. 

4. Upsetting your colleagues

The pitfalls of automated testing show a key point – namely, we can’t neglect the human element of the software. This idea applies to communications with our fellow professionals as well as the work we undertake. 

As a QA tester, it can be easy to get disappointed with the flaws you encounter. Even if it’s your job to do so, finding a lot of problems can start some awkward (yet necessary) conversations, and it’s not always clear how best to address them.

When working in a team, it’s necessary to be diplomatic in how you deliver criticism. Everyone in your workplace will aim for professionalism, but that’s not sufficient to stop egos from getting hurt. A hostile atmosphere is unpleasant to operate in and can have a negative influence on your workflow. 

Avoid saying the job is bad; this might be true on any level, but it’s still inefficient in fixing the difficulty. Try to suggest a solution or highlight something the developer did well while addressing your criticism. Above all, remember you’re all on the identical team, so it’s in your best attention to cooperate and get the work done.

It’s possible your department has gained some guidance in this area earlier as part of a business process alteration. If so, you might need to consult another department for advice in this area.

5. Overlooking the final steps

QA testing is an ongoing method, and professionals must see it through to the finish. This involves inspecting the results of the tests you undertake, even when it can feel unnecessary to do so. 

For instance, you might be tempted to neglect automation test results. As discussed previously, automated tests usually take place in random testing environments. We can’t know the effects of a test until it’s finished, so failing to consider these means we risk overlooking important problems with the software. 

More frequently, it’s worth learning that while a single test has an endpoint, software development is an ongoing method. Be at least a little flexible, receive software will change in design and features, and consider approaches like elastic QA to keep it operating efficiently.

Also Read: How To Optimize Customer Experience Using Testing


While QA is difficult and often stressful, it’s still important to work and can be made easier with some care and attention. Understanding the true nature of your role encourages you to start things on the right foot, as does choosing the right tools and working well with your colleagues.

Troubleshooting these difficulties assures that, even in an era of difficult budgets, QA professionals can do their tasks efficiently.

At TestUnity, we strive for the highest quality in every project, and our professional QA specialists are ready to ensure it. Contact us if you’re looking for a dedicated team to enhance your product’s quality.


Testunity is a SaaS-based technology platform driven by a vast community of testers & QAs spread around the world, powered by technology & testing experts to create the dedicated testing hub. Which is capable of providing almost all kind of testing services for almost all the platforms exists in software word.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *